An Execution and Its Witness

The McVeigh case and the triumph of victims’ rights.

View this article at The Weekly Standard

OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBER Timothy McVeigh is scheduled to die by lethal injection May 16 in a federal prison in Indiana, the first person to be executed under the federal death penalty law. Another first: Families of McVeigh’s victims and survivors of the attack received an invitation from federal authorities led by Attorney General John Ashcroft to watch a live closed-circuit broadcast of the execution. As of the May 1 deadline, some 285 (of about 3,000 eligible) had indicated they would turn out.

Everything about the Oklahoma City bombing resists efforts to put matters into context: the spectacular quality of the crime, its unique devastation as an exercise in mass murder, its utterly unrepentant perpetrator, and his grotesque ideological motivation. For an illustration of the exceptionalism, note that 22 percent of Americans in a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll both believe that McVeigh should be executed and oppose the death penalty. Some death penalty opponents have insisted that McVeigh’s is exactly the sort of hard case that requires opponents to stiffen their resolve against capital punishment. On the other hand, there is nothing obviously irrational about opposing capital punishment in general while allowing for an exception in the case of someone who murdered 168 of your countrymen.

Continue reading

Divided they fell

The Washington Times

The Bush administration is getting a massive break from political divisions among Democrats. The conflicts in thinking within the party, which were reconcilable when a Democratic president was doing battle with a Republican Congress, have so far turned out to be debilitating in opposition. The center-left is not holding, and Republicans haven’t had so much wind at their back since the heady days of 1995 (when, to be sure, that wind was actually blowing them into Bill Clinton’s perfect storm).

Continue reading

Catalysts of the impending recession?

The Washington Times

MENLO PARK, Calif. – There’s a fog in Silicon Valley. In the headquarters of the New Economy, the buzzword is “visibility,” and visibility is low. With the evaporation of nearly $4 trillion in stock market valuation as a result of the plunge in the tech-rich Nasdaq since the giddy highs of March 2000, and ample trouble signs throughout the rest of the economy, none of the corporate chieftains of high-tech here professes to know what lies ahead.

Continue reading

Beyond Beijing 2008

The Washington Times

Berlin 1936, Moscow 1980, Beijing 2008? Holding the Olympics in China eight years hence would indeed complete a picture. After all, of the three premier totalitarian regimes of the modern era, collectively responsible for the murder of scores of millions of people and the enslavement and subjugation of perhaps half the world all in all, only China has yet to enjoy the singular propaganda opportunity of basking in the reflected glory of the Olympic games.

Continue reading

Bush in the briar’s patch

The Washington Times

Was that a major setback for the Bush tax cut in the Senate last week? Democrats certainly had reason to advertise it as one. They found traction with an argument that finally addressed their real policy concern, namely, that a Bush-size tax cut would leave the government starved of resources to address other important national problems – for example, Medicare funding. The Senate voted to trim Mr. Bush’s proposed $1.6 trillion tax cut to about $1.2 trillion, in order to allow for spending increases elsewhere.

Continue reading

The right comes of age

The Washington Times

The Bush administration’s decision no longer to submit names of judicial nominees to the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary for advance evaluation of their qualifications represents a certain coming-of-age for conservatives in the GOP. The move reflects a new clarity of thinking about where conservatives fit in the scheme of things. Here’s the problem: The American Bar Association, as any conservative will tell you, is a left-leaning organization through and through. On any number of issues if not, indeed, on all issues on which it takes positions, from abortion rights to tort reform, the ABA is closer to the Democratic Party than the Republican Party.

Continue reading

Campaign finance reform?

The Washington Times

There is no reason to doubt the sincerity of the commitment of Sens. John McCain and Russ Feingold to the cause of campaign-finance reform, nor their belief that the current system is corrupting. But at the same time, the issue of campaign finance is obviously a great one for political posturing. I think that eventually some kind of reform legislation will indeed pass out of Congress and be signed into law by the president, if not this time around, then later. And each time the issue comes up and gets closer to passage, more of the interests underlying the principled rhetoric get exposed, thereby revealing more of the posturing for what it is.

Continue reading

A public life of private interest

The Washington Times

Bill Clinton is off the front pages at last, so perhaps now would be a good time to take stock of the controversy surrounding his eleventh-hour pardons. What with the criminal investigation by a U.S. attorney in New York and Democrats’ fundamentally unresolved view of the former president, the controversy and the political fallout can hardly be said to be over. But it doesn’t look like there’s a lot more left to come out. Even some of the hard-core Republicans in Congress are losing their enthusiasm for the issue.

Continue reading