“Enemy of the People”

View this article at The Weekly Standard

THE LEGAL CASE OF ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI, the so-called “twentieth hijacker” and the only person hauled into U.S. criminal court for playing a direct role in the September 11 attacks, has been a morass from the beginning. Prosecutors have struggled to shove the square peg of international terrorism into the round hole of the criminal justice system. With an erratic defendant throwing away due legal protections and at times insisting on acting as his own counsel, extensive wrangling over the use of classified evidence and access to testimony from other al Qaeda detainees, scores of court filings, rulings, and appeals, and finally a judge’s finding of egregious government misconduct during the trial, one must ask: Is this the best we can do?

Continue reading

Tom DeLay’s future

The Washington Times

It was surprising that Tom DeLay got to write his own narrative for his exit from Congress. One might have expected a greater degree of media and partisan skepticism directed at his self-portrait of his exit as a man seizing a political opportunity to extract maximum benefit for his party. At least, if my former deputy chief of staff had copped a plea to corruption charges the very same week, with more to come, I would expect skepticism.

Continue reading

Paris in the spring

The Washington Times

You are perhaps wondering what it is like to be in Paris at the time of a nationwide strike, in which demonstrators gather in an attempt to be deemed expressing the “general will” in opposition to their government’s betrayal of the principles of “liberty, equality, fraternity”? For there I found myself a week ago today, when – but let’s let Reuters catch us up, with reference to the repeat performance scheduled for today: “Tuesday’s demonstrations and strikes will be keenly watched for signs that two months of sometimes violent protests peaked last week with the three million demonstrators that unions say joined a nationwide day of action on March 28.” Where to begin? Maybe with the 3 million figure. That’s the figure the unions are giving, and it bears about as much relation to the actual size of the demonstrations as one might expect from those who have every incentive to vastly overstate their influence.

Continue reading

In full pursuit of democracy

The Washington Times 

That’s some feud between the White House and Francis Fukuyama, the Johns Hopkins professor and author of “The End of History and the Last Man.” Here’s Mr. Fukuyama writing in or quoted in the New York Times sniping at the Bush administration, and there’s the White House firing back by e-mail quoting Mr. Fukuyama’s past statements in contrast to his current ones.

Continue reading

“To be or not to be”

Questions for Ukrainians and Georgians

The Washington Times

Six years ago, the government of Lithuania invited me to Vilnius for a summit meeting of Central and Eastern European states geographically dispersed from Estonia in the north to Bulgaria on the Black Sea. The audacious purpose of that meeting was to announce that they had decided to work cooperatively on their common goal of integration into Western institutions, especially NATO. Rather than compete with one another to see which, in the post-communist period, deserved to be first to cross the line into full membership in the West, they would form a mutual support structure in pursuit of the quickest integration of all.

Continue reading

Turning the tide in Darfur

Deteriorating conditions require Bush’s leadership

The Washington Times

President Bush seems to have surprised some of the officials in his own administration with his forward-leaning comments on a decision in the works to support a substantial increase in the peacekeeping force trying to do something about genocidal conditions in Darfur. Good. It will take no less than the sustained personal engagement of the president of the United States to get something effective done there.

Continue reading

Peace in Theory

 What does Hamas’s victory mean?

View this article at The Weekly Standard

WITH HAMAS’S SMASHING VICTORY IN free and fair elections in Palestine, the case for democracy-promotion that George W. Bush outlined a year ago in his second inaugural address has been taking on water. Do we really want a political process that results in victory and legitimacy for terrorists? As Palestine goes, so might a democratic Syria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, etc., given the opportunity. All of a sudden, stability–in the form of dictatorial repression keeping a lid on something worse–maybe doesn’t look so bad.

Which makes the Hamas victory an “I told you so” moment for those who have been warning about the dangers of democracy promotion from the beginning–more or less since the end of the Cold War, but especially in relation to the Arab Middle East and in response to the Bush administration’s post-9/11 enthusiasm for democracy promotion there. Given the rise of Islamic radicalism in the late 20th century, the secular dictators of the region and the stability their authoritarian rule provides look like a preferable alternative, runs the critique. Let people vote, and they will vote the radicals in. Such was the sense of danger in Algeria in 1991, when the army intervened to cancel further elections after the fundamentalist Islamic Salvation Front ran strong in the first round of balloting.

Continue reading